top of page

Sympathy for the Devil

423b35_6e91748b8bb04e9784546422db44c7f2_
How compassionate are you?
University of Washington
Winter 2020
​
Department of German
​
Prof. Ellwood Wiggins
​
Graduate Mentors:
Dominik Matthias Alamanni
Anna Malin Gerke
Anshuang Yang
About

About

The Rhetoric of Compassion

2.webp

This course engaged in team-based learning. Students completed three projects that included both creative and analytical components. Groups worked to engender sympathy for a “bad guy” in four genres:

​

a speech,

a scene or story,

and a visual project.

​

This website is a collection of these creative projects.​

​

Is compassion the foundation of human morality or a dangerously unreliable emotion? This course explored the problem of sympathy in moral philosophy and examined the strategies in different media (Rhetoric, Drama, Novels, Film) of fostering empathy for commonly held enemies or discriminated groups.​​​​​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

​​​​​The syllabus ran from Ancient Greece to depictions of Nazis and terrorists in modern film, and considers philosophical assessments of sympathy (positive and negative) alongside examples of its aesthetic manufacture. Half of our readings were in moral philosophy, and in each case we used the literary text or film as a kind of experimental field to test the concepts laid out by the philosophical texts, and to evaluate the philosophers’ claims about the moral efficacy of compassion. Students also worked creatively to engender sympathy in four genres (rhetoric, drama, narrative, film). Hence there were three related skills we developed in the course: critical thinking; literary analysis; creative practice.​

​

We looked into the ethical implications of using dramatic compassion to further laudable social agendas of tolerance. This line of questioning reveals the discomforting unity of pity as a device in portrayals, for instance, of both Nazis and their victims: Is it possible for art works to persuade bigots to accept minorities and outcasts? Is it right for a film to invite sympathy for a monster like Hitler or a public menace like suicide bombers? It is vital to understand the action of sympathy before we assign it such momentous tasks as guiding our moral vision and encouraging a more tolerant society.​

​

The course worked through four units that concentrate on sympathy in a particular time period and a particular genre. After a first unit on pity in the ancient world through the practice of rhetoric, the next three units examined the production of sympathy especially in relation to European Jews. As perennial outsiders on the margins of society, often the victims of violent hate, Jews were both the objects and subjects of pity in artistic representations. This focus on sympathetic portrayals of one group of people allowed us to examine the claims of moral philosophers with clear, concrete, and consistent examples. We examined the ways that casting minorities as objects of pity can strategically forward—but structurally undermine—the project of creating a more open and just society.

​

​Unit 1: Rhetoric (Ancient Greece and Rome)​

Readings: Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Gorgias, Aristotle, Cicero 

​

​Unit 2.1: Drama (Early Modern through Enlightenment)​

Readings: Bible, Shakespeare, Spinoza, Rousseau, Adam Smith, Lessing, Moses Mendelssohn​

​

Unit 2.2: Narrative (19th Century)​

Readings: Kant, Schopenhauer, Chamisso, George Eliot, Nietzsche​

​

Unit 3: Film (20th – 21st Centuries)​

Readings: Brecht, Hannah Arendt, Martha Nussbaum

​Films: "I, Borg," Star Trek the Next Generation (USA, 1992); M (Germany 1931); Downfall (Germany, 2004); â€‹The Lives of Others (Germany, 2006); The Bubble (Israel, 2006)

​

​

​We engaged in team-based learning in this course. For each of the four units, teams worked on projects that included both creative and analytical elements, corresponding to the artistic works and the philosophers we examine during that unit. After each unit, students were be expected to articulate the positions of the philosophers on individual and team assessment tests.​

​

Poster seen at Seattle Womxn's Day March

January 21, 2017

Videos
bottom of page